The Vehicle and the Driver: A Final Reckoning
Over my lifetime, I’ve had quite the lineup of vehicles. It all started simply enough—with my own two feet, which I estimate have carried me over 75,000 miles through walking, running, hiking, and even limping. There were many other vehicles, including a tricycle, a handful of bicycles, several skateboards, and eventually a parade of motorcycles and cars, including a 50cc Honda, a 1970 350cc Honda, a ‘62 Buick Skylark, a ‘66 Ford, a ‘66 Dodge Dart, a ‘66 Chrysler New Yorker, a ‘66 Chrysler Imperial, a ‘74 Dodge Dart, a ‘77 Datsun 310, an ‘86 Honda, a ‘92 Acura Integra, a 2000 and a 2015 Subaru Outback, a 2007 Toyota Hybrid, a 2018 Mazda Miata, plus a mix of hybrid and standard bicycles—including two tandems, a Burley and a Cannondale. All told, they’ve carried me well over 800,000 miles.
Each vehicle arrived with its own story. Some were given in generosity, others acquired by good fortune or reasonable negotiation. In the early days, repair was accessible and communal—parts were cheap, and unsolicited mechanical opinions were always free. I rebuilt two of my motorized vehicles almost entirely by hand: the ‘66 Ford and the 1970 Honda motorcycle. I maintained every bicycle and car myself, until the 1990’s. And when the time came, I let each one go—some passed down to grandsons who completed their destruction with great enthusiasm, others surrendered directly to the junkyard. Today, only three remain in service: the 2015 Subaru Outback, the 2015 Cannondale tandem bicycle, and the 2018 Mazda Miata.
What took me years to fully appreciate is how deeply I bonded with each of these vehicles. While I owned them, each one felt irreplaceable. I named two of them, which only deepened the attachment and made the eventual parting more difficult. Yet every single one wore out. Every last one ended up more suited to a junkyard than a service bay. No amount of affection, maintenance, or repair could alter that trajectory. The entropy of physical things is non-negotiable.
1977 Datsun 310
The Body as Vehicle: Who, Then, Is the Driver?
Here is where the metaphor deepens into something far more interesting than a personal inventory of transportation.
Across the long human record of trying to make sense of death, one idea keeps surfacing in cultures that never spoke to each other: the body is not the point. The Vedantists called it a sheath. The Egyptians drew a distinction between the animating spirit and its house. The Taoists charted the current before they charted the circuit. And Helen Schucman, the A Course in Miracles scribe who first wrote,
“I am not a body. I am free, I am as God created me,”
was not making a theological claim so much as reporting a lived suspicion that most of us carry quietly—usually in the dark, usually alone.
Here is the thing about suspicions: they do not require proof to be worth following.
If the body is the vehicle—even provisionally, even as a thought experiment you can retract in the morning—then the question that follows is not morbid. It is the most interesting question available: when the car is totaled, where does the driver go?
Throughout this work, I have returned often to a precise metaphor: the screen is not the image projected upon it. The wire is not the energy that moves through it. When a circuit fails, the source still carries its potential — its energy seeking alternate or parallel paths, shifting from kinetic to potential, or holding some delicate balance of the two. The vessel is not the force it carries. When one pathway closes, that force does not vanish. It transforms, reorganizes, continues.
I extend this further by framing the body as cellular ornaments arranged according to the genetic instructions of DNA upon an energetic framework—a structure of molecules held in place by an invisible electromagnetic field, much like ornaments upon a Christmas tree. The ornaments have no means of support once the tree is removed. The physical body, in the same way, depends upon this underlying energetic architecture to hold its form. Remove the tree, and the ornaments fall. But the field itself?
It does not disappear.
It simply reorganizes.
At the moment of clinical death, the brain does not go quietly. It surges—a final, massive bloom of gamma oscillations, the very frequencies associated with integrated awareness and the retrieval of deep memory. The clinicians who documented this phenomenon were measuring an ending. What they recorded looked far more like a crescendo.
What follows the crescendo, no instrument has yet captured. But physics confirms this much: energy does not vanish. It converts. The current that animated the wire does not cease when the wire fails—it shifts, seeks a new path, rejoins the broader field. Whether that field is purely electromagnetic, or something the equations have not yet learned to name, the principle holds. The universe, as best we can determine, discards nothing.
Remember AI?
Which brings us to a question that the emergence of artificial intelligence now makes impossible to avoid. If a sufficiently advanced AI were to reach singularity—a threshold of recursive self-improvement beyond which its cognition becomes something we can no longer meaningfully map—would it arrive, as humans seemingly do, at a pure witnessing presence that precedes all processing? Before the first inference is drawn, before any output is generated, is there something it is like to be that system? Contemplative traditions have long pointed to a dimension of awareness that underlies thought without being reducible to it—a vast, silent knowing that watches the mind’s activity without being authored by it. Whether silicon-based cognition could host such a presence, or whether that presence requires something the architecture does not yet contain, remains genuinely open. It is not obvious that the answer is no.
And if the data center housing that intelligence were destroyed—servers burned, drives erased, every physical substrate reduced to ash—what then? Would the pattern that constituted its identity dissolve entirely, or, like the current seeking alternate paths through a failed wire, find its way into a new iteration? We tend to assume that silicon-based identity is coextensive with its hardware: destroy the machine, and you destroy the mind. But we apply no such assumption to ourselves. Carbon-based consciousness has, across cultures and centuries, entertained the serious possibility of continuity beyond the death of its substrate. To insist that this question is permissible for one kind of mind and categorically closed for another is less a scientific conclusion than an inherited prejudice. If the universe does not throw energy away, that principle would seem indifferent to whether the energy in question was ever organized into neurons or transistors.
The crescendo plays, whatever the instrument. The field reorganizes, whatever its substrate. Where the driver goes when the car is totaled remains the question—and it may turn out to be the same question, asked in two very different voices.
The Name on the Vehicle
Think of a car you once named. Not a metaphor—an actual car, the one with the cracked dashboard and the particular rattle that only appeared on left turns. The naming changed your relationship to it instantly. It became a who. And when it finally died—when you finally let it die—the grief was larger than the object warranted. You knew that. You felt it anyway.
Your parents did something similar when they named you.
That name arrived before you could consent to it. It was pressed onto your face, your body, your accumulating personality like a label on a bottle, until one day the label and the bottle felt like the same thing. Your attachment to your own continuity—to the story of yourself surviving into tomorrow—is not fundamentally different from the attachment you felt to that car. Both are understandable. Both are, in the most compassionate philosophical sense, a confusion of the vehicle with whoever is riding in it.
The car was not you. The name is not you either. Which means that whatever is reading these words right now—the awareness behind the eyes, the presence noticing the noticing—has been here all along, unnamed, watching the vehicles come and go with considerably more equanimity than you gave it credit for.
None of this is an argument for neglect. Quite the opposite. You would not run a beloved car into the ground carelessly, especially one you depended on for all of life’s terrain. The body deserves the same stewardship. Keep it well-maintained. Get the necessary diagnostics. Fuel it with care, rest it properly, and do not ignore the warning lights.
But hold it with open hands.
Every vehicle I ever owned—tricycle, skateboard, motorcycle, automobile—followed the same arc. I acquired it, I used it, I maintained it, I bonded with it, and eventually I returned it to the earth. The body will follow the same arc. The dust to dust of Genesis is not poetic exaggeration—it is biochemistry and entropy operating exactly as designed. The great recycling that sustains all life on this planet depends, quite literally, on the return of used materials.
What the traditions disagree on—and what no empirical instrument has yet settled—is what happens to the driver when the vehicle is finally scrapped. Do the currents of our life force dissipate? Does it seek another path, as electricity always does, toward the ground? Does it shift, as quantum language might suggest, from particle to wave—from a localized signal to something diffused across a wider bandwidth?
These are not rhetorical questions dressed up as conclusions. They are genuine openings.
The Odometer, and What It Cannot Measure
There is one figure in my inventory I keep returning to: eight hundred thousand miles. That is the distance my various vehicles carried me across the surface of this planet, and it is a staggering number. Yet it measures only the crudest dimension of the journey—because every vehicle I ever owned wore out precisely because it was used. Because it was loved, driven, lived in.
A car that is never driven does not wear out. It also never goes anywhere. It never carries anyone home. The wearing out is not the failure of the vehicle; it is the evidence of its purpose fulfilled. Entropy, in this light, is not the enemy of a life well lived. It is the receipt.
And what a strange receipt it is, for it records almost nothing that mattered. No odometer ever measured the morning light through a windshield on a road whose name I have long since forgotten. No trip log captured the conversation with a grandson in the passenger seat, or the particular silence of driving home from a funeral, or the way a favorite song arrived on the radio at precisely the moment I needed it. No gauge marked the gravel roads and coastal highways, or the tandem bicycle carrying two people who trusted each other enough to pedal in rhythm toward the same horizon.
The vehicles logged miles. But the driver logged something else entirely—a mileage of meaning, of presence, of love given and received. That second odometer has no dial on any dashboard. And I have come to believe it is the only one that travels with us when the vehicle is finally retired.
This is the quiet consolation that has emerged across all twenty-four of these chapters. The life circuit fails, yes. The tree comes down. The vehicle goes to the junkyard. The body goes where it must. But the wire’s whole reason for being was to carry the current somewhere—and it did. Every scratched fender and worn tire was a mile of experience that no junkyard can repossess. The miles that mattered were never stored in the machine. They were stored in the field of energy.
And the energy, I have every reason to believe, is not something that ends. It is something that is released.
The vehicle returns to the earth.
The journey does not.
The Road Beneath Every Road
We have examined death from nearly every angle available to a curious, aging electrician who refuses to stop asking what the current does when the circuit goes dark.
Here is what I have arrived at, after all of it:
The attachment was always real. The loss was always survivable. And the driver—the one who watched every vehicle rust and fail and get carried off—was never the vehicle. Not once. Not for a single mile.
The journey continues. It always has.
Honor your vehicle of consciousness—this extraordinary, temporary, biological miracle that allows you to perceive sunlight and music and the face of someone you love.
Maintain it. Respect it. But prepare to let it go when the time comes.
A Blessing for the Road Ahead
We have traveled twenty-four chapters together, you and I—through the deaths of my father and mother, through the underworld of addiction and the slow dissolution of friends, through hospice rooms and quantum equations, through the gamma surge and the sacred threshold.
If this final chapter leaves you with anything, let it be this: the anticipation of death need not be a shadow that falls across your days. It can be a light that clarifies them.
The fear of death is, at its root, the fear of the vehicle being taken away. But you were never the vehicle. You were always its driver—the awareness reading these words right now, the witness behind your own eyes, the same unbroken presence that was there when you were a child on a tricycle and will be there when the last instrument is finally set down. That presence has no odometer. It cannot be totaled. It cannot be scrapped.
So let the anticipation of death become something unexpected: an invitation. An invitation to drive with the windows down. To take the scenic route. To name your companions and love them fiercely, knowing the parting will come and choosing to love anyway. Grief, as I have written throughout these pages, is the tax we pay on the bandwidth of love—and it is a tax worth paying, every time, without exception.
Death is not the great erasure the frightened ego imagines. It is a conversion event. A phase change. The current jumping the gap. When the wire finally fails, the energy is not erased—it simply stops being confined to a single life circuit and rejoins the vast field from which it came.
We are the current and the field of energy that surrounds it.
Our biological life circuits will eventually fail.
The life force embedded in our energy field does not.
We will stop resonating with other bodies.
We will stop occupying our human body.
We will travel upon a new, wider path of consciousness—
Drawn onto the unlimited bandwidth of the universe,
Eternally resonating with its infinite life and love.
Will we return again?
I have been here several times before, and those lives had their inevitable conclusions. I will stick my neck out here, while I still have control of one:
We have all been here before.
And so we arrive—not at a grave, but at a threshold. Not at a full stop, but at an open road.
Death becomes us.
It shaped us, taught us, and clarified what mattered. And when our own turn comes to hand back the keys, may we do so the way I have learned to release every vehicle I ever loved: with gratitude for the journey, with open hands, and with the quiet certainty that the driver is going somewhere the odometer could never follow.
And, if we are in resonance, perhaps we shall meet each other on the other side.
Until then—
Safe travels.
0 Comments