All of my writing is the result of a search for truth that I began in 1986, after a near suicide experience. I had written twelve hundred pages of material by 2021 about the effect of trauma and its relationship to mental illness and societal disease, and how healing might be experienced from its effects.  I I spent nearly $20,000 on editors and other support to prepare this voluminous work for publication, but I found no interest in the community for such work, so I suspended the effort to get this information to the public.  

My “search for Truth” would take a long detour through my relationship with my father.  I never had much desire to write about the “search for truth” that I had undertaken in the 1980’s, let alone the rest of my oft-times irrelevant, isolated life.

Why on earth would I want to write about important elements of my family, or of my personal life?

The answer to that question is that I never did, up until around the year 2013. When I had to retire early from my career as an electrician to provide extra care for my father, I finally had the time to consider where I was, where I had been, and where I might want to be, for the limited time that I had left on this planet. I saw how my life’s foundation was that which was provided for by the works and processes established through our family’s history, and through the history of all fathers who had ever lived.

My sister has always been quite the family historian, and in the past, I would defer to her, to let her develop the elements of the family history that might be the most interesting or important in nature.  Yet, my sister could not fully develop the emotional heritage of those ancestors, due to the limitations of the availability of letters written by them, the deaths of too many of the carriers of the family history, and any of her resistance to discussing the impact that trauma had upon herself and the family.  Since my father was so available to me, I took advantage of my direct, almost continuous engagement with my father and his memories, as well as some family records, to help me develop the story.

My father, Beryl Donald Paullin, was a product of the Great Depression, having been born in 1927. His Father, also named Beryl, was a Fire Chief who was respected within the community, and also feared in his home because of his abusive nature and alcoholism. I know little else about Grandpa Beryl (also known as Bruce), other he also served in the military, during World War 1, and is buried in Willamette National Cemetery, as is my father.  My father kept my sister Pam and I away from Grandpa Beryl until we were teenagers, that is how much my father wanted to protect us from his oppressive presence. While in our early teenage years, Pam and I did visit with Grandpa Beryl at his La Center home twice, and I visited him in the VA hospital prior to his death. In his later years, he was sober and seemed like a pleasant enough man.

Grandma Elsie, Grandpa Beryl, Susie Paullin circa 1948

Dad’s mother Elsie was the classic abused wife, suffering also through physical and emotional problems while married to “that Brute”, as my father referred to him. I also know little about her, either, other than she had kidney disease, was one of the first Oregonians to receive a kidney transplant, and that she died shortly after my birth.  John Edward was dad’s older brother (Ed preceded him in death) and Ed was removed from his home and placed at their grandparents’ farm in Oregon City at 6 years of age, after nearly being beaten to death by their father.

I later learned that Elsie secretly gave birth to a daughter at age 15, which she gave up for adoption. Elsie had claimed that she had been raped by several young men, which resulted in her pregnancy, but it was later learned that this was a family lie. This unfortunate lie was to be passed on to Susie when Susie became pregnant with Sharyn Robinson, with Elsie counseling Susie to use this story as a cover to her out-of-wedlock pregnancy to a married man that she had taken a fancy to at age 25.  Susie still lived with her parents at that age, perhaps due to light cognitive impairment, or poor self-esteem, and was deeply influenced by both her mother and father.

Uncle Ed and Dad

Gloria (or Susie) as most people now know her, was his younger sister, and both Susie and my father suffered under abusive conditions for most of their childhood. Both my father and my aunt displayed some symptoms of PTSD for most of their lives, as well as both being products of the age of which they grew up.  Over the years, Dad found a way to manage his life much more successfully than his sister Susie, for sure.  Susie carried an unfortunate and hurtful story about my father all the way to the end of my father’s life, which was that it was my father’s fault that Edward was almost beat to death, because my father, at four years of age, tipped over a lamp, and broke it.  Edward’s near fatal beating supposedly arose from that event.

My father really loved his older brother Ed, through all of the years of his life, though he loved to challenge Ed about the mess that was always present in the yard on Ed’s farm.  Ed loved to collect old and junk cars, much to the chagrin of his neighbors, friends, some family members, and the local police department.  Sharon and I started sharing in their love beginning in 1995, when we all started sharing breakfasts, and family gatherings together for the first time.  My Uncle Ed was a masterful storyteller, and I always enjoyed it when he grabbed my ear, for his epic tales about family, friends, and his work at the Crown Zellerbach paper mill, where he was the lead electrician for over forty years.

In 1943, at 16 years of age, Dad enlisted in the Marines, as he wanted to serve his country, get away from his family of origin, as well as he thought of himself as a “dummy”, with no faith in his ability to successfully finish high school at Benson Polytech. His mother promptly collared the local Marine Corp recruiter and forced dad’s return home from the service. He re-enlisted in the Navy the moment he turned 18 years of age, and was assigned duty on two different warships, the West Virginia, and the Wisconsin, during his two years in the Navy. Upon his return from active duty in 1947, he returned home, where he threatened his dad with death if Grandpa Beryl ever laid a hand on his mother again. Dad moved on from that relationship with his mother and father, not seeing either of them again for quite some time.

He started college at the University of Portland, studying Psychology, Logic, Metaphysics, Philosophy of Mind, and other courses, from 1947-1952. He wanted to understand himself and the world better, and the inner workings of minds that would bring harm to their families. He wanted to understand the human mind at the deepest level (his curious mind about other issues only left him after my mother’s death in 2009). But he had to delay his search for the truth about the broken human mind, as his now hyper-busy life got in the way of him finishing his studies of the human condition.  Dad formed a great friendship and relationship with Father Delaney, who taught at the University of Portland, and in whose name the Delaney Institute was named. He struggled a bit with his schoolwork, but he did stay at it over a course of five years, which did not result in a degree.

 I was to later pick up my father’s mantle, and I have made my own attempts to finish the job that he had started, which was understanding the human mind. And, like my father, I rebel against the spiritual and philosophical authorities of the day, sometimes sharing with the readers of my blog, Substack, and Facebook readers my insights.

Dad still had a fire in his heart, and an incredible desire to succeed. He worked harder than anybody around him, the sign of a classic “overachiever”. He endlessly drove himself, and he was going to overcome his upbringing, and prove to the world that he had higher value than the poor self-esteem that his verbally and physically abusive father had inculcated him with. His perfectionism and zealousness for order and efficiency was utilized to its best advantage in his future employment with the US Postal Service. That same attitude tended to, at times, challenge others, especially those that he attempted to help, or manage, as both a general manager with the Postal Service, and as a friend and family member.

An interesting and compelling offshoot of my father’s career at the US Postal Service was that he had made friends with some employees in the 1950’s prior to his management career there.  He had many conversations with peers about his life and family.  One conversation revolved around Dad’s need to keep me quiet at night, because I was a noisy, crying baby, so that he could get some sleep, because Dad worked two jobs, the USPS having too poor of a salary to sustain him.  He told Bob B. that my mother would wrap my baby body in a blanket and place me into their car in the garage from about 10:00 PM until 2:30 AM, when Dad would go to his second job delivery newspapers for the Oregonian.  I worked for the USPS from 1975-1985, and heard the story directly from Bob, who sought me out in 1976 to tell me the story.  I knew nothing about trauma and its potential for dramatic wounding then, so I just accepted the story, not knowing what to do with it.  I did get confirmation from my parents that they actually did that.

A person with a passive/aggressive personality, like me, had the most difficulty with him. Those who were self-assured or had found their own voice, and engaged him directly, had the best relationship with him, and he really enjoyed engaging with others in stimulating, challenging discussions. Those who took the time to get to know Dad, also found a way to love him, in spite of his rough edges. But it was hard to get to know him because too many times he would lead with a derogatory remark, or insult, and bad first impressions rarely get changed.

My dad and his brother and sister had an older sister that they never knew of, until very late in their lives, after their mystery sister had passed away.  And Susie had a daughter she had adopted out and “forgot about”, who came back into her life in 2004 after Sharyn researched the records and found the records showing her birth mother as being Susie. Sharyn wanted to know about her birth father, and Susie told her that malicious lie inspired by Elsie that Sharyn was a product of a rape, and not a love relationship with a married man named Lauren.  Yes, that information had the negative impact that you would suspect it might.

Sharyn eventually, came to live with Aunt Susie in 2015.  Sharyn had contributed to a failed marriage through infidelity and drug addiction and became homeless, living out of her car with her beloved dog Ruby.  Sharyn needed a place to recuperate from a diabetic wound in her foot, and, conveniently for us, we needed extra eyes on Aunt Susie because of her deterioration, so we encouraged Aunt Susie to let her daughter stay with her for a little while.  Susie finally relented, letting Sharyn in. That “little while” turned into two years, and it was a relationship fraught with complexity and mutual woundedness.

One day, Aunt Susie confided in Sharon that Sharyn was not the product of a rape, but of an illicit relationship with a married man.  I was shocked and dismayed, and after an intense conversation with my wife Sharon, we determined that Sharyn needed to know the truth about her biological father.  Sharon was to deliver that powerful, reorienting story to Sharyn, a story that we both hoped would bring some measure of healing to Sharyn about her origins.  Sharyn was created in a loving atmosphere, and not the violence of rape.  Sharyn was relieved but eventually hated her biological mother as she neared death from pancreatic cancer in August of 2017.

When Generational Trauma Becomes a Family Legacy

Sharon came home yesterday (July 18, 2025) from a visit to an estranged cousin of mine, Cindy.  She sat down to talk with me about her experience attempting to visit with Cindy in her home.  I am seated in my writing chair, with Aunt Susie’s cat Sassy nestled next to my right leg, as she has often done for the three years since we first received her.  As Sharon relates the rude reception that she received from Cindy’s household, with Cindy’s son actually threatening Sharon while Cindy cowered in the shadows, I find my voice rising as energy builds within me.  Sassy looks at me intently, as this is unusual behavior for me.  Sharon points out the cat’s concern, as well as her own. 

Cindy’s family continues its decades long neglect of Susie, which has resulted in Sharon assuming all responsibility for Susie’s care and placement, especially over the last ten years, as no other family members have showed any interest since Sharyn, her abandoned, drug addicted daughter, returned for two years in 2015 until her death from pancreatic cancer.

The Mountain Park Memory Care center holds more than a frail 96-year-old women. It cradles the weight of decades, the final chapter of a family story written in shadows and silence. Aunt Susie lies there, her life force ebbing, representing the last tangible family connection to a network of relationships that alcoholism and abuse have systematically disfigured or dismantled over generations.

Her impending death marks more than personal loss—it signals the official severing of ties to an entire branch of family history. The irony cuts deep: the very bonds meant to nurture and sustain have become conduits for pain, passing trauma from one generation to the next like a cruel inheritance no one asked to receive.

This is the story of how one man’s darkness—my grandfather Beryl’s alcoholism and violence—created ripples that continue to disturb the waters of our family decades after his death. It’s also a meditation on the profound choices we make when confronted with the possibility of perpetuating cycles we never chose to enter.

Susie occupied a unique position in our family constellation. For years, she served as the bridge between past and present, the keeper of memories both cherished and painful. Through the early 2000s, when my parents were still alive, she traveled with us, shared our gatherings, became woven into the fabric of our celebrations and ordinary moments.

Sharon’s devotion to Susie’s care stands as a testament to love’s persistence even within damaged systems. For years, she provided guidance and support, navigating the complexities of an estranged daughter and other family complications that seemed to multiply like weeds in neglected soil. The care center where Susie now resides represents Sharon’s final act of protection—a safe harbor after storms that raged for decades.

We’re attempting to arrange medical transport so Susie can see her beloved cat Sassy one final time. The cat, who nearly died earlier this year, mirrors Susie’s own fragility. There’s something profoundly moving about this desire—two elderly souls, both survivors, seeking one last moment of connection before the inevitable separation. Yet Susie’s condition may make even this simple reunion impossible, adding another layer of loss to an already heavy narrative.

My father rarely spoke of his childhood, but when he did, he referred to Beryl simply as “that brute.” The descriptor carries the weight of lived experience—not mere disapproval, but recognition of genuine cruelty. My sister Pam and I weren’t introduced to our grandfather until near his death, when years of sobriety had softened his edges but couldn’t erase the damage he’d inflicted on his children.

Beryl’s alcoholism wasn’t just a personal failing; it became the foundation for generational trauma that would echo through decades. Like a stone thrown into still water, his violence created expanding circles of pain that touched lives he would never directly encounter. The abuse he inflicted on his children became the template they unconsciously carried forward, even as they struggled against repeating his patterns.

This is the insidious nature of family trauma—it doesn’t announce itself with fanfare. Instead, it whispers in moments of stress, shapes our responses to conflict, and influences how we understand love, safety, and trust. Beryl’s brutality became a ghost haunting futures he would never see.

Susie paid the fullest price for her father’s alcoholism and abuse. The child who should have been protected instead learned that love comes wrapped in violence, that safety is temporary, and that her worth depended on the volatile moods of those who should have cherished her unconditionally.

Poor self-esteem became her constant companion, whispering lies about her value and capabilities. These internal wounds manifested in her parenting of daughter Cindy, creating a tragic cycle where the abused became the abuser—not from malice, but from the only blueprint she possessed for relationships.

This pattern reveals one of trauma’s cruelest aspects: it transforms victims into unwitting perpetrators. Susie’s struggles with parenting weren’t moral failures but predictable outcomes of a childhood spent learning survival rather than love. Her weak parental skills weren’t character flaws but symptoms of a deeper wounding that was never properly addressed or healed.

The consequences of Beryl’s abuse didn’t end with Susie. Like a genetic predisposition toward certain diseases, trauma created vulnerabilities that manifested in subsequent generations. Cindy and at least one of her sons have experienced poor mental health outcomes—depression, anxiety, relationship difficulties, and other manifestations of inherited pain.

Perhaps most heartbreaking was Susie’s other daughter, Sharyn, who spent her final days in August 2017 openly expressing hatred toward her biological mother. The tragedy isn’t just in the hatred itself, but in recognizing it as trauma’s final victory—a daughter unable to forgive the mother who was herself a victim, both women trapped in patterns neither fully understood nor chose.

These outcomes weren’t inevitable, but they were predictable. When families lack the tools to process and heal trauma, it becomes a toxic legacy passed from parent to child like a reverse inheritance—each generation receiving not wealth or wisdom, but wounds that compound over time.

Witnessing the effects of generational trauma throughout my childhood, observing my father’s “heavy hand” and recognizing the patterns that seemed to repeat regardless of good intentions, I made a conscious decision never to have children. This choice wasn’t born from hatred of family or children, but from a deep recognition that trauma seeks new hosts, and I refused to become another conduit for the wounding of innocents.

This decision represents both loss and liberation. Loss, because it means certain family lines end with me—stories, traditions, and even positive qualities won’t be passed forward. Liberation, because it breaks a cycle that has caused immeasurable pain across multiple generations.

Some might view this choice as defeatist, but I see it as an act of responsibility and even love. Love for the children who will never experience the confusion of receiving care wrapped in cruelty. Responsibility for recognizing that good intentions aren’t always enough to overcome deeply embedded patterns of harm.

The personal becomes political when we recognize that families don’t exist in isolation. The same dynamics that destroyed my family’s ability to maintain healthy connections—the normalization of cruelty by Donald Trump’s administration, the worship of power over compassion, the inability to acknowledge and address harm—have become institutionalized in broader society.

When we witness the traumatization of innocents such as immigrants or poor and disabled people becoming normalized, when cruelty is celebrated rather than condemned, we see family dysfunction writ large. The failure to heal collective trauma creates the conditions for its perpetuation on ever-larger scales.

This recognition carries both despair and possibility. Despair, because the patterns seem so entrenched, so resistant to change. Possibility, because understanding trauma’s mechanics offers pathways toward healing that previous generations didn’t possess.

As Susie’s life draws to its close, I find myself reflecting on what we leave behind when the last witnesses to our stories die. Her death will sever our final connection to my father’s family network, but perhaps that severing is also a mercy—an end to patterns that have caused more harm than healing.

The effects of alcoholism and generational trauma do indeed outlive us all, but so do the choices we make to interrupt their transmission. Every person who recognizes these patterns and chooses differently becomes a circuit breaker in trauma’s electrical system. Every family that learns to process pain rather than pass it forward changes the trajectory for future generations.

Aunt Susie’s legacy isn’t just the trauma she inherited and inadvertently transmitted. It’s also the love she showed when she could, the connections she maintained despite her wounds, and the final lessons her life offers about the true cost of unhealed family pain. In witnessing her story with clear eyes, we honor both her suffering and her humanity, while choosing different paths forward.

The weight of legacy isn’t just what we receive from the past—it’s what we decide to carry into the future.

Generational Trauma: Breaking the Cycle of Pain and Creating a Legacy of Healing

“The effects of alcoholism and generational trauma outlive us all, but so do the choices we make to interrupt their transmission.”

Sharon comes home yesterday from a visit to an estranged cousin of mine, Cindy.  Sharon stopped by to let daughter Cindy know that Susie was nearing death, as if Cindy had any cares about her mother.  I had given up on Cindy years earlier, when she rudely dismissed me and my efforts to keep her in the flow of information about her deteriorating mother. 

She sits down to talk with me about her experience attempting to visit with Cindy in her home.  I I am seated in my writing chair, with Aunt Susie’s cat Sassy nestled next to my right leg, as she has often done for the three years since we received her because of Aunt Susie’s admission into the memory care center.  As Sharon relates the rude reception that she received from Cindy’s household, with Cindy’s son actually threatening Sharon while Cindy cowered in the shadows, I find my voice rising as energy builds within. I know that Danny is mentally ill, as is his mother Cindy.  I believe that they are both engaged in mutual hostage taking of each other.  But their disease will not take us hostage.

Sassy looks at me intently, as this is behavior is common for me when I detect that a loved one has been wronged.  Sharon points out the cat’s concern, as well as her own.  Cindy’s family continues its decades long neglect of Susie, which has resulted in Sharon assuming all responsibility for Susie’s care and placement, especially over the last ten years, as no other family members have showed any interest since Sharyn, her abandoned, drug addicted daughter, returned for two years in 2015 until her death from pancreatic cancer. Aunt Susie was able to maintain residence in her home for five more years, through home care arranged by Sharon, until her own decline necessitated a change for a safer living environment.

The Mountain Park Memory Care center holds more than a frail 96-year-old women. It cradles the weight of decades, the final chapter of a family story written in shadows and silence. Aunt Susie lies there, her life force ebbing, representing the last tangible family connection to a network of relationships that alcoholism and abuse have systematically disfigured or dismantled over generations.

Her impending death marks more than personal loss—it signals the official severing of ties to an entire branch of family history. The irony cuts deep: the very bonds meant to nurture and sustain have become conduits for pain, passing trauma from one generation to the next like a cruel inheritance no one asked to receive.

This is the story of how one man’s darkness—my grandfather Beryl’s alcoholism and violence—created ripples that continue to disturb the waters of our family decades after his death. It’s also a meditation on the profound choices we make when confronted with the possibility of perpetuating cycles we never chose to enter.

Generational trauma is the invisible thread that runs through families, intertwining with shared stories and inherited wounds. For centuries, it has quietly shaped family dynamics, influencing relationships, behaviors, and decisions. This subtle yet profound force, often left unspoken, can echo through generations, leaving behind a toxic legacy of unresolved pain.

Within my own family, the shadow of generational trauma looms large, rooted in my grandfather Beryl’s alcoholism and abuse. It is a story of fractured relationships, estrangement, and the cyclical perpetuation of pain. Yet, it is also a story of choice, love, and the possibility to break the cycle—to rewrite the script for future generations.

But how do we truly recognize and address this deeply embedded pattern? More importantly, how can our individual choices and collective actions pave the way for healing, both within families and within society? Let’s explore these questions through personal reflection, systemic insight, and a call to action for change.

To grasp the profound effects of generational trauma, we must first understand what it is. Generational trauma, often referred to as intergenerational or transgenerational trauma, is the psychological and emotional residue passed down from one generation to the next. It arises from unprocessed traumatic experiences, often transmitted through:

  • Learned Behaviors: Coping mechanisms shaped by trauma, such as avoidance, aggression, or emotional repression.
  • Parenting Styles: Patterns of interaction that mirror the trauma experienced by previous generations.
  • Cultural and Systemic Norms: Broader societal acceptance of dysfunctional or harmful behaviors, perpetuating cycles on a larger scale.

This concept is not just theoretical. Studies have shown that major historical traumas, such as genocide, slavery, and colonization, leave enduring scars on descendants. Within families, the impacts are equally profound, manifesting in poor mental health, strained relationships, and even physiological effects.

Generational trauma often feels like an invisible force, influencing dynamics in subtle but predictable ways. Within my family, the traumatic legacy of Beryl’s alcoholism and violence shaped us for decades. My father’s terse descriptions of Beryl as “that brute” hinted at the scars he carried, ones he rarely spoke of but that ultimately influenced how he parented. My aunt Susie, Beryl’s daughter, bore many of the brunt impacts of his abuse, creating a ripple effect felt by her own children and grandchildren.

Some common patterns of generational trauma within families include:

  1. Cycles of Abuse and Addiction: Adults who experienced abuse may unintentionally replicate those behaviors in their relationships.
  2. Polarized Family Roles: Family members adopt fixed roles, such as the “rescuer,” the “scapegoat,” or the “enabler,” often preventing authentic emotional connections.
  3. Avoidance of Conflict: Fear of reenacting trauma can lead to emotional distance and suppressed dialogues, keeping wounds unspoken but alive.
  4. Poor Mental Health Outcomes: Anxiety, depression, and even physical ailments can stem from inherited emotional neglect or traumatic experiences.

Susie’s struggle with parenting illustrates one of trauma’s cruelest aspects—that victims unwittingly pass their unresolved pain to the next generation. Her poor self-esteem, molded by Beryl’s cycles of rage and withdrawal, left her ill-equipped to parent Cindy, her own daughter. Cindy’s strained relationship with her mother continued the legacy, leading to further dysfunction in her own children.

Understanding these patterns is the first step toward breaking the cycle. Individuals who recognize the influence of generational trauma gain the unique opportunity to disrupt its transmission.

For me, recognizing my family’s traumatic legacy led to a conscious, albeit difficult, decision—not to have children. It was a deliberate effort to end the cycle of pain that had persisted for too long. Others in my family, such as my wife Sharon, chose a different path by actively caring for Susie, embodying resilience and love within a fractured system.

Breaking generational trauma is not about assigning blame. It is about taking responsibility for one’s role in the larger narrative and choosing to write a different chapter. This process involves:

  • Acknowledgment: Naming and confronting the trauma, breaking the silence that keeps it alive.
  • Seeking Support: Whether through therapy, support groups, or open family conversations, healing requires collaboration and external perspectives.
  • Creating Healthy Boundaries: Recognizing toxic patterns and protecting oneself and others from further harm.
  • Developing New Patterns: Introducing and modeling behaviors rooted in love, safety, and mutual respect.
  • Educating the Next Generation: Providing children and younger family members with tools and awareness to advocate for their mental and emotional well-being.

Every person who makes these conscious choices becomes a “”circuit breaker”” in trauma’s chain. Small changes ripple outward, creating possibilities for healing that previous generations couldn’t imagine.

The dynamics of generational trauma extend beyond families. They mirror systemic issues, such as those seen in national policies and the normalization of cruelty within broader society.

During the Trump administration, this dynamic was writ large. Policies that vilified immigrants, neglected the poor, and dismissed the disabled reflected a collective inability to process and heal societal trauma. These behaviors reinforced cycles of harm, with striking parallels to the dysfunction observed in families like mine.

Addressing generational trauma on a personal level requires families to recognize their wounds and grow through them. Similarly, addressing systemic trauma requires societies to confront their past failures, acknowledge harm, and invest in healing. This includes:

  • Advocating for policies that prioritize mental health and family support.
  • Challenging cultural norms that glorify power at the expense of compassion.
  • Reimagining systems that currently perpetuate harm, from punitive approaches to justice to neglectful healthcare systems.

Generational trauma is a difficult legacy to hold. But acknowledging its presence is the first step toward creating a different future. It is not about erasing pain or pretending the past never happened. It’s about choosing how we respond to it, how we address it, and how we change its trajectory.

As Susie’s life draws to its close, I find myself reflecting on what we leave behind when the last witnesses to our stories die. Her death will sever our final connection to my father’s family network, but perhaps that severing is also a mercy—an end to patterns that have caused more harm than healing.

The effects of alcoholism and generational trauma do indeed outlive us all, but so do the choices we make to interrupt their transmission. Every person who recognizes these patterns and chooses differently becomes a circuit breaker in trauma’s electrical system. Every family that learns to process pain rather than pass it forward changes the trajectory for future generations.

Aunt Susie’s legacy isn’t just the trauma she inherited and inadvertently transmitted. It’s also the love she showed when she could, the connections she maintained despite her wounds, and the final lessons her life offers about the true cost of unhealed family pain. In witnessing her story with clear eyes, we honor both her suffering and her humanity, while choosing different paths forward.

What we leave behind is not just the wounds that shaped us. It is also the love, care, and courage we bring to the healing process. Aunt Susie’s life, though marked by pain, also offers profound lessons in resilience and connection. By honoring her humanity, we honor our responsibility to carry forward healing, not harm.

Every family has a story. Every story carries both wounds and wisdom. Which path will we choose to amplify for future generations? The choice lies with us.

Begin the healing process by learning more about generational trauma, supporting mental health initiatives, and advocating for compassionate systems.

Together, we can disrupt harmful patterns, creating legacies rooted in love instead of pain.


Bruce Paullin

Born in 1955, married in 1994 to Sharon White